Parcel Perform is now Perform.AI. Read More, Parcel Perform is now Perform.AI.
perform.ai logo
Data & IntegrationsSupply Chain7 min read

North vs. South: The American Delivery Showdown During BFCM 2024

Key insights on how BFCM 2024 impacted logistics in North and South America, with trends, challenges, and solutions.

North vs. South: The American Delivery Showdown During BFCM 2024

Published on

Feb 27, 2025

The holiday shopping season is a big deal for e-commerce businesses in both North and South America, and it is marked by the high-traffic shopping events of Black Friday and Cyber Monday (BFCM). These busy shopping days represent the pinnacle of consumer spending, with millions of shoppers going online to find the best deals. In 2024, shoppers spent a massive $10.8 billion on Black Friday and $13.3 billion on Cyber Monday, showing how important these days are.

For e-commerce businesses and logistics carriers, this surge in sales brings both opportunities and challenges. On one hand, it's a chance to boost revenue and attract new customers. On the other hand, it puts immense pressure on logistics networks to handle the increased parcel volume and ensure timely deliveries. Failing to meet customer expectations during this BFCM period can lead to dissatisfaction and lost sales.

This article aims to provide valuable insights and advice for logistics professionals in the American market. We will explore key delivery performance metrics from BFCM 2024 in both North and South America. By analyzing these trends, we hope to help businesses and e-commerce logistics carriers better prepare for the holiday rush and optimize their delivery operations. 

Key Insights from BFCM 2024 in the Americas

1. Regional Breakdown: North & South America

During BFCM 2024, North America saw a huge increase in parcel volume, with a 79.2% rise compared to the pre-BFCM period. This massive surge in orders presented significant challenges for e-commerce businesses. In South America, there was a 3.8% increase in parcel volume during BFCM, which, while smaller than the rise in North America, still created logistical challenges for businesses in the region. Handling such a large number of parcels requires efficient logistics networks and delivery capacity, which can be difficult to manage during peak shopping periods.

Delivery Performance Trends

In North America, delivery performance was impacted by the surge in parcel volumes. Before BFCM 2024, the average transit time was 2.2 days, and this increased to 2.6 days during BFCM. This means parcels took longer to reach their destinations during the peak shopping period. The first-attempt delivery success ratio slightly improved from 97.8% to 98.2%. However, the issue ratio, which includes problems like inaccurate addresses and lost parcels, significantly increased from 6.4% to 11.0%. The carrier issue ratio also rose from 4.4% to 9.7%, highlighting the increased strain on delivery networks.

In South America, similar trends were observed. Before BFCM 2024, the average transit time was 2.3 days, and this increased to 2.5 days during BFCM. The first-attempt delivery success ratio saw a slight improvement from 92.0% to 93.2%. However, the issue ratio decreased from 8.4% to 7.2%, while the carrier-related issues remained stable at 0.5%. This suggests that despite the increase in parcel volume, delivery performance in South America experienced fewer complications compared to North America.

What’s Driving These Trends?

The massive increase in parcel volume during BFCM put a lot of strain on logistics networks, causing delays and making deliveries more challenging. With more people shopping online, the roads became more congested, and carriers had a harder time navigating traffic and meeting delivery times. Also, the limited capacity of shipping carriers during the busy holiday season added to the problem, making it harder to keep up with the surge in orders.

In North America, the higher issue ratio suggests there were more delivery pitfalls, such as parcels getting lost or being sent to the wrong addresses. This can be linked to the high number of orders and the pressure on delivery workers to keep up with the demand. The increased workload can lead to mistakes and a drop in the quality of service.

2. Delivery Performance of the Top 3 Busiest Trade Lanes in the Americas

The holiday shopping season of Black Friday and Cyber Monday (BFCM) led to significant changes in delivery performance across North and South America. Let’s explore the top 3 busiest trade lanes in each region, focusing on delivery performance metrics and the factors that influenced these trends.

North America

1. The United States to the United States (US – US)

During BFCM, the average transit time for parcels within the United States increased from 2.3 days before BFCM to 2.6 days. The first-attempt delivery success ratio saw a slight improvement, rising from 98.7% to 98.8%. However, the carrier issue ratio also went up, from 4.0% to 6.5%. This indicates that while more parcels were successfully delivered on the first try, carriers faced more issues, possibly due to the high volume of orders.

2. Canada to Canada (CA – CA)

In Canada, the average transit time increased from 2.1 days before BFCM to 2.7 days during BFCM. The first-attempt delivery success ratio improved from 92.7% to 95.4%. However, the carrier issue ratio saw a significant rise, from 6.5% to 24.0%, which is notably high. This suggests that despite the improvements in delivery success on the first attempt, carriers struggled with handling the increased volume of parcels, leading to more issues.

3. Mexico to Mexico (MX – MX)

For deliveries within Mexico, the average transit time went up from 2.0 days before BFCM to 2.6 days during BFCM. The first-attempt delivery success ratio decreased from 96.0% to 94.4%. Additionally, the carrier issue ratio increased from 11.9% to 14.0%, indicating that carriers faced more delivery challenges in delivering parcels during the peak shopping period.

South America

1. Argentina to Argentina (AR – AR)

In Argentina, the average transit time increased slightly from 2.0 days before BFCM to 2.1 days during BFCM. The first-attempt delivery success ratio decreased from 93.3% to 91.2%, and the carrier issue ratio went up from 0.5% to 0.7%. These changes suggest that there were some challenges in maintaining delivery performance during the peak period.

2. Chile to Chile (CL – CL)

In Chile, the average transit time increased from 2.1 days before BFCM to 2.4 days during BFCM. The first-attempt delivery success ratio saw a slight decrease from 92.2% to 91.9%. Interestingly, the carrier issue ratio dropped from 0.1% to 0.0%, indicating that despite the increase in transit time, carriers managed to avoid significant issues.

3. Brazil to Brazil (BR – BR)

Brazil experienced a noticeable increase in average transit time, from 3.0 days before BFCM to 4.3 days during BFCM. The first-attempt delivery success ratio decreased from 93.5% to 90.9%, and the carrier issue ratio increased from 0.8% to 1.6%. These changes highlight the challenges faced by carriers in handling the high volume of parcels during BFCM.

Key Factors Impacting Delivery Performance

1. Carrier Capacity

The surge in parcel volume during BFCM put significant pressure on carrier capacity. Carrier capacity limitations played a crucial role in the performance of these trade lanes.

In North America, the increased volume of orders led to more delays and delivery issues. In South America, the impact was varied, with some trade lanes experiencing more significant delays and issues than others. 

2. Local Regulations or Infrastructure

Regulations and infrastructure also influence delivery performance. 

In North America, well-developed infrastructure helped mitigate some challenges, but the sheer volume of orders still led to delays. In South America, variations in infrastructure quality and regulations affected delivery times and issue ratios. For instance, Brazil's longer transit times could be attributed to infrastructure challenges, while Chile's stable carrier issue ratio suggests better handling of increased volumes.

Impact of BFCM on E-commerce Businesses and Solutions

The BFCM shopping rush brings both opportunities and challenges for e-commerce businesses and logistics providers. Understanding how BFCM affects businesses is essential, as it allows them to implement practical solutions to overcome these challenges and improve performance.

High Issue Ratios in Canada and Mexico Due to Carrier-Related Problems

During BFCM, both Canada and Mexico experienced significant service reliability issues with carriers, leading to delays and increased customer complaints. To address these challenges, businesses should consider the following strategies:

  • Diversify Carrier Networks: Reduce reliance on single carriers susceptible to disruptions.

  • Implement Real-Time Carrier Performance Monitoring: Proactively identify and address potential issues.

  • Utilize Automated Carrier Selection: Optimize shipment routing using real-time data and predefined business rules.

Longer Transit Times During Peak Season Affecting Customer Satisfaction

The expectation of rapid deliveries during the BFCM shopping surge can lead to significant customer frustration when transit times extend beyond anticipated windows. To effectively manage these challenges and enhance customer satisfaction, businesses should focus on two key strategies:

  • Utilize AI-Powered Delivery Predictions:

    • These systems provide accurate delivery estimates by leveraging historical data and real-time conditions.

    • This allows businesses to proactively manage customer expectations and provide realistic delivery timelines.

  • Implement Proactive Communication Strategies:

    • Maintain consistent communication with customers through real-time tracking updates.

    • Provide timely notifications regarding any potential delays.

    • This transparent approach helps to mitigate frustration and improve overall customer satisfaction.

High Recipient Issue Ratios in South America Leading to Failed Deliveries

In South America, many deliveries failed due to address inaccuracies or recipients not being available. To combat these issues and improve delivery success rates, businesses can implement the following customer-centric solutions:

  • Offer Delivery Date and Time Scheduling:

    • This empowers customers to select their preferred delivery slot, enhancing convenience.

    • By providing this option, businesses significantly increase the likelihood of successful first-attempt deliveries.

  • Provide Alternative Delivery Locations:

    • Establish pick-up points or secure locker options to offer greater flexibility.

    • This alternative delivery method reduces the risk of missed deliveries due to recipient unavailability, providing a more reliable and convenient experience.

Final Insights and Solutions for BFCM Success in the Americas

Deliveries in the Americas during BFCM 2024 weren't exactly smooth sailing. We saw longer delivery times, more issues popping up, and a lot of variation across regions. Bottom line: you've got to be smart and plan ahead with solid data.

The good news is, Perform.AI can help you fix a lot of that. We're talking real-time tracking, insights into how your carriers are performing, and automated updates for your customers. It's all about making deliveries easier and keeping your customers happy. If you want to see how we can help you get ready for the next big rush, let's chat. Book a demo, and we'll walk you through it.

#logisticsoperations#Businessleaders#Track

LATEST

Related blogs

Interviews, tips, guides, industry best practices, and news.

View all posts
A glowing green glass stamp marks dispatch papers on a dark desk for a Missing Parcel Reshipment Policy
Perform.AINov 05, 2026
Machine Learning & AI
When to Reship Missing Parcels Before Carrier Claims CloseStop waiting on carrier claims. Use scan anomalies to trigger instant reshipments and save customer retention.
Read post
A robotic arm sorts glowing green parcels for Rate Shopping: Dynamic Route Allocation
Perform.AINov 05, 2026
Machine Learning & AI
Dynamic Route Allocation and Real-Time Rate ShoppingStop leaking margin on static carrier rules. Connect checkout promises to real-time dynamic route allocation now.
Read post
A glowing green turnstile gate with a checkmark for Estimated Delivery Date
Perform.AINov 05, 2026
Machine Learning & AI
Stop Hiding Your Estimated Delivery Date During PeakStop hiding your estimated delivery date during peak. Dynamic checkout optimization protects conversion and margin.
Read post
Harmonizing Multi-Carrier Tracking for Dynamic Routing, a green laser beam refracts through a glass
Perform.AINov 05, 2026
Machine Learning & AI
Unifying E-commerce Tracking Across Dynamic Carrier RoutesStop tracking black holes. Learn how to harmonize multi-carrier tracking data and protect your post-purchase experience.
Read post
A glowing green balance scale weighs coins for AI Commerce: Multi-Carrier Rating Without Plan
Perform.AINov 05, 2026
Machine Learning & AI
Multi-Carrier Rating in Agentic Commerce Without UpgradesDecouple shipping logic from your storefront. Get multi-carrier rating without expensive platform plan upgrades.
Read post
A glowing green glass shopping cart rests on dark platforms for Delivery Promise
Perform.AINov 05, 2026
Machine Learning & AI
Perform.AI vs Shipium: Setting the Delivery PromiseCompare Perform.AI and Shipium on setting a delivery promise. See how estimated delivery dates drive conversion.
Read post
Glowing green card terminal on a black desk for checkout optimization: compare conversion
Perform.AINov 05, 2026
Machine Learning & AI
How to Compare Checkout Conversion Rates Across StorefrontsStandardize multi-store checkout analytics. Compare conversion rates and track funnel drop-off across every domain.
Read post
A green scanner emits a laser across data panels, triaging failed deliveries to reduce WISMO
Perform.AINov 05, 2026
Machine Learning & AI
Triaging Failed Deliveries Before Support Tickets SpikeStop failed first attempts from becoming WISMO tickets. Triage delivery exceptions instantly with automated workflows.
Read post